A comparative study of Elevation of depressed tibial plateau fracture (Schazer type 2 and 3) by Autograft and synthetic bone substitute

Introduction: There is no unanimous opinion for the use of grafting agent in reconstruction depressed tibial condyle fracture. Autograft most commonly used filling elvation However there are certain limitations which led to a recent attraction toward synthetic bone substitute like crystalline hydroxyl apatite granules and blocks.In this study, we have compared functional outcome complications autograft graft fractures.Materials Methods: A total 40 patients with acute fracture were studied. Bone applied 20 cases, respectively. The age was between 50 years, minimum followup period 12 months maximum 18 .The Radiological assessment done using modified Rasmussen clinical criteria.Results: two infections observed, occurred substitute. Articular surface collapse seen three patients, one patients. mean score 18.50 18.55 allograft received respectively (p = 0.09). radiological 15.50 15.60 0.3). In doner site morbity.Conclusion: While comparing complication rate, versus TPF, hydroxy could be as good alternative well.